I N D E X
had prepared to [for] the people [probably referring to their willing participation and contribution
to these services], for the thing had come suddenly" [without long previous preparation] (2
Chronicles 29:35, 36).
What followed shows that, however sudden the impulse in this religious revival, it was neither
transient nor superficial. Of all the festivals in Israel, the most solemn was that of the Passover. It
commemorated Israel's national birthday as the redeemed of the Lord, and pointed forward to that
better deliverance of which it was the emblem. Ordinarily this feast commenced on the evening of
the 14th Nisan (Exodus 12:6, 8, and parallels). But in the present instance this was impossible. Not
only had the cleansing of the Temple occupied till the 16th of the month, but a sufficient number
of priests for the services had not yet sanctified themselves, while further time was required to
make announcement of the Passover throughout all Israel. For, unlike the services at the
reconsecration of the Temple, which seem to have been confined to the inhabitants of Jerusalem,
this was to be observed as a great national festival. But it was possible to remove the difficulty
thus arising. The law, while fixing the ordinary date of the Passover, had also made provision for
an after-celebration of the feast on the correspo nding day of the second month in cases of
unavoidable hindrance (Numbers 9:6 -13). This is one of the most instructive commendations on
the character of the Mosaic law. It shows that the outward form was not of its essence, but was
flexible and adaptable. Thus the law was not something rigidly outward and absolutely permanent,
but gave indication of the possibility of an enlargement by a higher fulfillment of its spirit as
distinguished from the mere letter. Hence such a provision seems like an unspoken pledge of a
future transformation of the law, in accordance with the higher conditions and the wants of new
circumstances. Lastly, it also affords a precedent and a warrant for such a change as that of the
transference of the Sabbath from the close of the week to its beginning; from the day of rest to that
of the Resurrection of Christ; from the memorial of the completion of the first creation to that of
the second in the creation of the new heavens and the new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness.
Of this legal provision of an after-Passover, Hezekiah resolved to avail himself. We mark as
specially interesting in itself, and as foreshadowing great changes in the future political and
ecclesiastical organization of Israel, that Hezekiah acted in this with the advice of "his princes and
all the congregation in Jerusalem" (2 Chronicles 30:2). And yet more interesting is it to learn that
the invitation to attend the Passover addressed by the king "and his princes" was sent not only to
the cities of Judah, but to all Israel, "from Beersheba even to Dan." To this the text adds the
retrospective notice that previous Paschal observances had been partial, not general: "for not in
multitude [in large numbers] had they done it, as it is written"* (2 Chronicles 30:5).
* Any previous celebration had not been attended by the people generally, according to the Law,
but had been partial and local. The rendering of brl by "in multitude," and not, as in A.V., by "for
a long time," seems established by the use of the same expres sion in regard to the priests in ver.
24. It is also confirmed by such passages as Genesis 20:30; 48:16; Deuteronomy i:10. The
rendering is very important, as showing, first, the continued observance of the Passover; secondly,
its admittedly sparse attendance, which rendered it more local than national. This also accounts for
its rare mention in the historical books.
This brotherly invitation to the feast of Israel's birth and the common worship of their God and
Redeemer was, so to speak, the answer which repentant Judah now made to that fratricidal war
which Israel had so lately waged with the object of exterminating the kingdom of David. And the
letters of the king and the princes bore such tender references to past sin and judgment, and to
present national calamity,* and breathed such a spirit of religious hope for the future, as almost to
rise to the level of New Testament sentiment.
* It must be remembered that this Paschal celebration was in the first year of Hezekiah, and
therefore in the third or fourth of Hoshea - or several years before the final overthrow of Samaria.
On the annexation of Naphtali to the Assyrian empire, and the partial deportation of Israel referred
to in 2 Chronicles 30:6, 7, 9, see ch. 8. On the later national calamities in t he time of Hoshea, see
ch. 9.