connection with 1 Chronicles 5:26. As Pul and Tiglath-pileser are one in the same person, and the
transportation alluded to was the second - that under Shalmaneser, or rather than Sargon (compare
2 Kings 17:6) - we can only suggest that by some confusion caused by the two names Pul and
Tiglath-pileser, the later has by a clerical error, crept into the text, instead of Shalmaneser or else
Sargon.
The advance of Tiglath-pileser, marked by the occupation of those towns in a straight line from
north to south, concerted Galilee and the adjoining trans-Jordanic district into an Assyrian
province, which served as a basis for further operations. These terminated - perhaps after passing
near or through Jerusalem - with the occupation of Samaria, where a revolution ensued, in which
Pekah fell. He was succeeded by the leader of the rising, Hoshea, who became tributary to
Assyria. The easier part of his undertaking accomplished, Tiglath-pileser turned his arms against
Damascus. Here he met with a stubborn resistance. Holy Scripture only records (2 Kings 16:9)
that Damascus was taken, Rezin killed, and the people carried captive to Kir - a district not yet
certainly identified, but apparently belonging to Media (compare Isaiah 21:2; 22:6). It was thence
that the Syrians had originally come (Amos 9:7), and thither they were again transported when
their work in history was done (Amos 1:5).
Unfortunately, the Assyrian tablets which record this campaign are mutilated, that in which the
death of Rezin was recorded being lost. But we learn that the siege of Damascus occupied two
years; that Rezin was shut up in his capital, into which he had been driven; that not only was every
tree in the gardens round Damascus cut down, but, in the language of the tablet, the whole land
desolated as by a flood. With the capture of Damascus, the Damasco-Syrian empire, which had
hitherto been a scourge for the punishment of Israel, came to an end. Henceforth it was only a
province of Assyria. It is in the light of all these events that we have to read such prophec ies as
those in Isaiah 7 and the firs part of chapter 8.
The majestic divine calm of these utterances, their lofty defiance of man's seeming power, their
grand certitude, and the withering irony with which what seemed the irresistible might of these
two "smoking friebrands" is treated - all find their illustration in the history of this war. Such
prophecies warrant is in climbing the heights of faith, from which Isaiah bids us to look, to where,
in the dim distance the morning glow of the new Messianic day is seen to fill the sky with glory.
But in Damascus the conquered did Tiglath-pileser gather, as for an Eastern durbar, the
vanquished and subject priunces. Thither also did King Ahaz go "to meet" the king of Assyria; and
thence, as the outcome of what he had learned from prophecy and seen as its fulfillment in history,
did this king of Judah send the pattern of the heathen altar to Jerusalem (2 Kings 16:10, 11). On
the Assyrian monuments he is called Joachaz (Ja -u-ha- zi). But scared history would not join the
name of the Lord with that of the apostate descendent of David. For all time it points at him the
finger, "This is that King Ahaz" (2 Chronicles 28:22); and he sinks into an unhonored grave, "not
into the sepulchers of the kings of Israel" (ver. 2 7). And yet other and still wider-reaching lessons
come to us from this history.
CHAPTER 9 - HOSHEA, (TWENTIETH) KING OF ISRAEL.
Summary of this History - Accession of Hoshea - Religious Character of his Reign - Death of
Tiglath-pileser and Accession of Shalmaneser IV. - Expedition into Palestine and Submission of
Hoshea - Attempted Alliance of Israel with Egypt - Hoshea made a Prisoner - Siege of Samaria -
Account of it in the Assyrian Inscriptions - Accession of Sargon - Capture of Samaria -
Deport ation of Israel - Localities of their Exile - The new Colonists of Samaria and their Religion
- Lessons of this History. (2 KINGS 17)