and the sin of Israel in rearing altars and chapels on "the high places" must have led to the inference that the national
worship was that of mountain -deities.
Thus did Israel's disobedience bring also its temporal punishment. But to their general advice the courtiers of
Ben-hadad added certain practical suggestions, to avoid the secondary causes to which they attributed their late defeat.
The tributary "kings" were to be dismissed, and their places filled by governors. This would give not only unity to the
army (comp. 1 Kings 22:31), but these officers, appointed by Ben-hadad himself, would naturally take a more personal
interest in the cause of their king. And, instead of the former army, Ben-hadad was to raise one equal in numbers, but -
as the text has it - "from those with thee"48 (thine own subjects).
In these well -conceived measures there was only one, but that a fatal, flaw. They proceeded on the supposition that the
God of Israel was like one of the heathen deities. And this point was emphasized in the defeat of the Syrians, which
was announced t o Ahab by "a man of God," probably another than "the prophet" who had formerly been commissioned
to him. But it deserves special notice that this message only came after the invasion of the Syrian host. Thus would the
temptation be avoided of neglecting all ordinary preparations: faith would be tried, and also called forth; while, by this
prediction, and from the disparity between Israel and the host of Syria, Israel would once more learn to recognize in
this deliverance that Jehovah He was God.
The winter rains had ceased, and the spring wind and sun had dried the land. There was a fresh crispness in the air, and
a bright light over the scene, when the immense Syrian host swarmed down into that historic battlefield of Israel, the
great plain of Jezreel. W e are carried back in imagination to the scene of Saul's last fatal defeat (1 Samuel 29:1),49 and
beyond it to that of Gideon's glorious victory.
Once more the foe lay at Aphek, with his back against the hill on which probably the fortified city of that name stood,
and facing the plain where it is broadest. As in imagination we travel southwards to the highlands, and to those
mountains among which Samaria lies embosomed, we feel how literally Ben-hadad had acted on the suggestion of his
servants to avoid a contest with the mountain -deities of Israel. It was the very time and place for Jehovah to show forth
that great lesson which underlies and sums up all revelation. Of the Israelitish host we know not the numbers - only
that, as they camped in two divisions on the opposite side of the valley, perhaps beneath the two spurs of the ridge that
juts into the plain from the south-east, they seemed like two little flocks of kids so small and weak, as compared with
their enemies. For seven days the two armies lay observing each other. From the circumstance, specially mentioned in
the text, that the Israelites had gone out "provisioned" (ver. 27, margin), and even from their camping in two divisions,
we infer that the object of Ahab was to remain on the defensive, which, indeed, the inferiority of numbers rendered
imperative. Besides, the Jewish position was most happily chosen. It barred the advance of the enemy, who could not
move forward without first giving battle to Israel. The Syrians must have perceived the advantage of Ahab's position,
with his back to the base of his operations, while the division of Israel into two camps might enable them to envelop
their enemies if they attempted an advance, in which case the very size of the Syrian army would, from its
unwieldiness, prove a serious difficulty. But the danger of idle delay in a hostile country, and in an Eastern warfare,
was nearly as great. And so on the seventh day the attack was made - as we judge, by the Syrians. Their defeat was
crushing. The great Syrian host of 100,000 was destroyed,50 and the men who either made their way from the battle -
field to Aphek, or who had been left there as a garrison, experienced another and even more terrible calamity. While
crowding into the gates, or else while occupying the ramparts, which had probably been hastily thrown up or
strengthened, a wall fell upon 27,000 of their number. 51
Further defense being thus rendered impossible, the previous confidence of Ben-hadad gave place to abject fear. He
fled from room to room- into the innermost chamber. His servants, who had formerly given such warlike counsel, now
advised him to sue in most humble manner for his life, holding out the hope of the mercifulness of the kings of Israel of
which they had heard. There is an ominous sound in this. The kings of Israel had never been distinguished for mercy.
But they had only too often shown their sympathy with the heathen kingdoms around, and manifested a desire to make
alliance with them, and to conform to their ways. Yet, even so, it is not easy to explain the conduct of Ahab when the
Syrian envoys of Ben-hadad appeared before him, in true Eastern manner, with sackcloth on their loins and ropes round
their necks, suing only for the life of him who now ostentatiously styled himself A hab's "slave." It could scarcely have
been due to weakness of character when Ahab broke into the almost joyous exclamation, "Is he yet alive?" Nor could it
have been merely from kindness of disposition that he ostentatiously substituted: "he is my brother" for the designation,
"thy slave Ben-hadad," used by the Syrian envoys. They were not slow to perceive the altered tone of the king. They
favorably interpreted and laid hold on that which had come from him; and they said: "Thy brother Ben-hadad."52