I N D E X
A public mourning was ordered, in which the murderers themselves had to take part. The king in his official
character followed the murdered man to his burying, pronounced over him an appropriate elegy, and
publicly announced his intention to fast, in token of personal mourning. From the remark added in the
sacred text (ver. 37), it seems that such proofs of sincerity were requisite to counter-balance the suspicions
otherwise excited by such an instance of treachery and deception in high places. To his own immediate
surroundings - his "servants" (vers. 38, 39) - David spoke more unreservedly, lamenting the circumstances
which still made him comparatively powerless in face of such reckless chiefs as the sons of Zeruiah.
But, on the other hand, increasing public confidence rewarded David's integrity of purpose. It was needed, if
high-handed crime was to be suppressed in the land. Another glaring instance of the public demoralization
consequent on Saul's long misrule soon occurred. The death of Abner had naturally the most discouraging
effect, not only upon Ish-bosheth, but upon all his adherents. No one was now left of sufficient prominence
and influence to carry out the peaceable revolution which Abner had planned. The present weak
government could not long be maintained; and if Ish-bosheth died, the only representative of Saul's line left
was a crippled child, Mephi-bosheth ("the exterminator of shame," or "of Baal"  253 ), the son of Jonathan,
whose deformity had been caused by the nurse letting him fall when snatching him up for hasty flight on
receiving tidings of the disastrous day at Jezreel.
Not even the most ardent partisan could have wished to see on the throne of Israel a child thus permanently
incapacitated. But few could have been prepared for the tragedy which was so soon to put an end to all
difficulties.
It seems that two of Ish-bosheth's "captains of bands," prompted, no doubt, by the hope of rich reward, h ad
in the most deliberate and treacherous manner planned the murder of Ish-bosheth. They were brothers, from
Beeroth, on the western boundary of Benjamin, but included in its territory (Joshua 18:25). Hence they were
of the same tribe with Saul, which, of course, aggravated their crime. For some unexplained reason the
Beerothites had fled en masse to Gittaim - perhaps, as has been suggested, on the occasion of Saul's
slaughter of the Gibeonites (2 Samuel 21:1, 2). This, however, can scarcely be regarded as the motive of their
crime.254
Probably on pretense of superintending the receipt of what was necessary for the provisioning of their men,
they entered the royal residence at the time when Ish-bosheth was taking the customary Eastern midday
rest, made their way into his bed-chamber, stabbed him in his sleep in the abdomen, and cut off his head, to
carry it to David as gory evidence of their deed.255
The reception which they met was such as might have been expected. To the daring appeal of those
interested murderers that they had been the instruments of Jehovah's vengeance upon Saul's wrongs to
David, the king gave no further reply than to point to what had hitherto been the faith and experience of his
heart and the motto of his life: "Jehovah liveth, Who hath redeemed my soul out of all adversity!" It needed
not man's help, least of all the aid of crime. Never - not even in his darkest hour - had he either desponded,
doubted, or sought to right himself. His strength, as his confidence, had lain in realizing Jehovah as the
living God and his all-sufficient Savior. No other deliverance did he either need or seek. But as for this crime
- had not his conduct to the lying messenger at Ziklag sufficiently shown his abhorrence of such deeds?
How much more in regard to a murder so foul as this! Swift, sure, and signally public punishment was the
only possible reply in such a case.
And thus at last, not by his own act, but through circumstances over which he had had no control, - allowed
by Him Who gives full liberty to each man, though He overrules even the darkest deeds of the wicked for
the evolving of good - David was left undisputed claimant to the throne of Israel. Faith, patience, and
integrity were vindicated; the Divine promises to David had come true in the course of natural events - and
all this was better far than even if Saul had voluntarily resigned his place, or Abner succeeded in his plans.