Words like these, of which the truth was so evident, could not but make their way even to the heart of Saul.
For a moment it seemed as if the dark clouds, which had gathered around his soul and prevented the light
penetrating it, were to be scattered. Saul owned his wrong; he owned the justice of David's cause; he even
owned the lesson which the events of the past must have so clearly taught, which, indeed, his own
persecution of David had, all unconsciously to himself, prophetically indicated, just as did the words of
Caiaphas the real meaning of what was done to Jesus (John 11:49-52). He owned the future of David, and
that in his hand the kingdom of Israel would be established; and all this not in words only, but practically,
by insisting on a sworn promise that in that future which he foresaw, Oriental vengeance would not be taken
of his house.
And yet David himself was not secure against the temptation to personal vengeance and to self-help,
although he had resisted it on this occasion. The lesson of his own weakness in that respect was all the
more needed, that this was one of the most obvious moral dangers to an ordinary Oriental ruler. But David
was not to be such; and when God in His good Providence restrained him as he had almost fallen, He
showed him the need of inward as well as of outward deliverance, and the sufficiency of His grace to
preserve him from spiritual as from temporal dangers. This may have been one reason why the history of
Nabal and Abigail is preserved in Holy Scripture. Another we may find in the circumstance that this incident
illustrates not only God's dealings with David, but also the fact that even in the time of his sorest
persecutions David was able to take upon himself the care and protection of his countrymen, and so, in a
certain sense, proved their leader and king.
The whole story is so true to all the surroundings of place, time, and people, that we can almost portray it to
ourselves. Samuel had died, mourned by all Israel. Although his work had long been finished, his name must
always have been a tower of strength. He was the link which connected two very different periods, being
the las t representative of a past which could never come back, and seemed almost centuries behind, and
also marking the commencement of a new period, intended to develop into Israel's ideal future. Samuel was,
so to speak, the John the Baptist who embodied the old, and initiated the new by preaching repentance as
its preparation and foundation. It was probably the death of Samuel which determined David to withdraw
still farther south, to the wilderness of Paran,218 which stretched from the mountains of Judah far to the
desert of Sinai.
Similarly our blessed Lord withdrew Himself after the death of John the Baptist. In the wilderness of Paran
David was not only safe from pursuit, but able to be of real service to his countrymen by protecting the
large flocks which pastured far and wide from the predatory raids of the wild tribes of the desert. It was thus
(25:7, 15, 16) that David had come into contact with one whom we only know by what was apparently his by-
name, Nabal, "fool" -an ominous designation in Old Testament parlance, where "the fool" represented the
headstrong, self-willed person, who followed his own course, as if there were "no God" alike in heaven and
on earth. And so he is described as "hard" -stubborn, stiff, - and "evil of doings" (ver. 3). His wife Abigail
was the very opposite: "good of understanding, and fair of form." Nabal, as Scripture significantly always
calls him was a descendant of Caleb. His residence was in Maon, while his "business" was in Carmel, a place
about half an hour to the north-west of Maon. Here, no doubt, were his large cotes and folds, whence his
immense flocks of sheep and goats pastured the land far and wide. It was the most joyous time for such a
proprietor - that of sheep-shearing, when every heart would be open. A time of festivity this (ver. 36), which
each would keep according to what was in him. And Nabal had cause for gladness. Thanks to the ever
watchful care of David and his men, he had not suffered the slightest loss (vers. 15, 16); and the rich
increase of his flocks crowned another year's prosperity. It was quite in the spirit of an Eastern chieftain in
such circumstances, that David sent what would be a specially respectful embassy of ten of his men, with a
cordial message of congratulation,219 in the expectation that at such a time some acknowledgment would be
made to those who not only deserved, but must have sorely needed the assistance of a rich Judaean
proprietor.
But Nabal received David's message with language the most insulting to an Oriental. The provocatio n was
great, and David was not proof against it. Arming about four hundred of his men, he set out for Carmel, with
the determination to right himself and take signal vengeance. Assuredly this was not the lesson which God