(Cheth. 50), "If you set your child to regular study before it is six years old, you shall
always have to run after, and yet never get hold of it." This chiefly has reference to the
irreparable injury to health caused by such early strain upon the mind. If, on the other
hand, we come upon an admonition to begin teaching a child when it is three years old,
this must refer to such early instructions as the of certain passages of Scripture, or of
small isolated portions and prayers, which a parent would make his child repeat from
tenderest years. As we shall show in the sequel, six or seven was the age at which a
parent in Palestine was legally bound to attend to the schooling of his son.
But, indeed, it would have been difficult to say when the instruction of the Hebrew child
really commenced. Looking back, a man must have felt that the teaching w ich he
h
most--indeed, one might almost say, which he exclusively --valued had mingled with
the first waking thoughts of his consciousness. Before the child could speak--before it
could almost understand what was taught, in however elementary language--before it
would even take in the domestic rites of the recurring weekly festival, or those of the
annual feasts --it must have been attracted by the so-called "Mesusah," which was
fastened at the door-post of every "clean" apartment,32 and at the entrance of such
houses as were inhabited by Jews exclusively. The "Mesusah" was a kind of phylactery
for the house, serving a purpose kindred to that of the phylactery for the person, both
being derived from a misunderstanding and misapplication of the Divine direction (Deu
6:9, 11:20), taking in the letter what was meant for the spirit. But while we gladly concede
that the earlier Jewish practice was free from some of the present almost semi -heathenish
customs,33 and further, that many houses in Palestine were without it, there can be little
doubt that, even at the time of Christ, this "Mesusah" would be found wherever a family
was at all Pharisaically inclined.
For, not to speak of what seems an allusion to it, so early as in Isaiah 57:8, we have the
distinct testimony of Josephus (Ant. iv, 213) and of the Mishnah to their use (Ber. iii. 3;
Megill. i. 8; Moed K. iii. 4; Men. iii.7--in the last-mentioned place, even with
superstitious additions). Supposing the "Mesusah" to have been somewhat as at
present, it would have consisted of a small, longitudinally -folded parchment square, on
which, on twenty-two lines, these two passages were written: Deuteronomy 6:4-9, and
11:13-21. Inclosed in a shining metal case, and affixed to the door-post, the child, when
carried in arms, would naturally put out its hand to it; the more so, that it would see the
father and all others, on going out or in, reverently touch the case, and afterwards kiss
the finger, speaking at the same time a benediction. For, from early times, the presence of
the "Mesusah" was connected with the Divine protection, this verse being specially
applied to it: "The Lord shall preserve thy going out and thy coming in from this time
forth, and even for evermore" (Psa 121:8). Indeed, one of the most interesting ancient
literary monuments in existence--"Mechilta," a Jewish commentary on the book of
Exodus, the substance of which is older than the Mishnah itself, dating from the
beginning of the second century of our era, if not earlier--argues the efficacy of the
"Mesusah" from the fact that, since the destroying angel passed over the doors of
Israel which bore the covenant-mark, a much higher value must attach to the
"Mesusah," which embodied the name of the Lord no less than ten times, and was to be
found in the dwellings of Israel day and night through all their generations. From this to
the magical mysticism of the "Kabbalah," and even to such modern superstitions as
that, if dust or dirt were kept within a cubit of the "Mesusah," no less a host than three
hundred and sixty-five demons would come, there is a difference of degree rather than of
kind.
But to return. As soon as the child had any knowledge, the private and the united
prayers of the family, and the domestic rites, whether of the weekly Sabbath or of festive
seasons, would indelibly impress themselves upon his mind. It would be difficult to say
which of those feasts would have the most vivid effect upon a child's imagination. There
was "Chanukah," the feast of the Dedication, with its illumination of each house, when
(in most cases) the first evening one candle would be lit for each member of the
household, the number increasing each night, till, on the eighth, it was eight times that
of the first. Then there was "Purim," the feast of Esther, with the good cheer and