travelling on the two first festive days was not actually unlawful, yet we can scarcely
conceive that Jesus would have done so - especially on the Feast of Tabernacles; and
the inference is obvious, that Jesus had tarried in the immediate neighbourhood, as we
know He did at Bethany in the house of Martha and Mary. 68
67. St. Luke x. 38.
68. No one who impartially reads St. John xi. can doubt, that the persons there
introduced are the Martha and Mary of this history, nor hence that their home was in
Bethany.
Other things, also, do so explain themselves - notably, the absence of the brother of
Martha and Mary, who probably spent the festive days in the City itself. It was the
beginning of the Feast of Tabernacles, and the scene recorded by St. Luke69 would take
place in the open leafy booth which served as the sitting apartment during the festive
week. For, according to law, it was duty during the festive week to eat, sleep, pray,
study - in short, to live - in these booths, which were to be constructed of the boughs of
living trees.70 And, although this was not absolutely obligatory on women,71 yet, the rule
which bade all make 'the booth the principal, and the house only the secondary
dwelling,'72 would induce them to make this leafy tent at least the sitting apartment alike
for men and women. And, indeed, those autumn days were just the season when it
would be joy to sit in these delightful cool retreats - the memorials of Israel's pilgrim-
days! They were high enough, and yet not too high; chiefly open in front; close enough
to be shady, and yet not so close as to exclude sunlight and air. Such would be the
apartment i n which what is recorded passed; and, if we add that this booth stood
probably in the court, we can picture to ourselves Martha moving forwards and
backwards on her busy errands, and seeing, as she passed again and again, Mary still
sitting a rapt listener , not heeding what passed around; and, lastly, how the elder sister
could, as the language of verse 40 implies, enter so suddenly the Master's Presence,
bringing her complaint.
69. x. 38-42.
70. Comp. 'The Temple and its Services,' p. 237, &c.
71. Sukk. ii. 8.
72. u.s. 9.
To understand this history, we must dismiss from our minds preconceived, though,
perhaps, attractive thoughts. There is no evidence that the household of Bethany had
previously belonged to the circle of Christ's professed disciples. It was, as the whole
history shows, a wealthy home. It consisted of two sisters - the elder, Martha (a not
uncommon Jewish name,73 being the feminine o f Mar,74 and equivalent to our word
'mistress'); the younger, Mary; and their brother Lazarus, or, Laazar.75 Although we
know not how it came, yet, evidently, the house was Martha's, and into it she received
Jesus on His arrival in Bethany. It would have b een no uncommon occurrence in Israel
for a pious, wealthy lady to receive a great Rabbi into her house. But the present was
not an ordinary case. Martha must have heard of Him, even if she had not seen Him.
But, indeed, the whole narrative implies,76 that Jesus had come to Bethany with the
view of accepting the hospitality of Martha, which probably had been proffered when