From the circumstance that St. Luke omits throughout his narrative all notation of time
or place, the difficulty of arranging here the chronological succession of events is so
great, that we can only suggest what seems most probable, without feeling certain of
the details. Happily, the period embraced is a short one, while at the same time the
narrative of St. Luke remarkably fits into that of St. John. St. John mentions three
appearances of Christ in Jerusalem at that period: at the Feast of Tabernacles,1 at that
of the Dedication,2 and His final entry, which is referred to by all the other Evangelists.3
But, while the narrative of St. John confines itself exclusively to what happened in
Jerusalem or its immediate neighborhood. it also either mentions or gives sufficient
indication that on two out of these three occasions Jesus left Jerusalem for the country
east of the Jordan (St. John x. 19-21; St. John x. 39-43, where the words in ver. 39,
'they sought again to take Him,' point to a previous similar attempt and flight). Besides
these, St. John also records a journey to Bethany - though not to Jerusalem - for the
raising of Lazarus,4 and after that a council against Christ in Jerusalem, in consequence
of which He withdrew out of Judę n territory into a district ne ar 'the wilderness'5 - as we
a
infer, that in the north, where John had been baptizing and Christ been tempted, and
whither He had afterwards withdrawn.6 We regard this 'wilderness' as on the western
bank of the Jordan, and extending northward towards the eastern shore of the Lake of
Galilee.7
1. St. John vii. to x.
2. x. 22-42.
3. St. Matt. xx. 17 &c.; St. Mark x. 32 &c.; St. Luke
xvii. 11 &c.
4. St. John xi.
5. xi. 54.
6. St. Luke iv. 1; v. 16; vii. 24.
7. St. Luke viii. 29.
If St. John relates three appearances of Jesus at this time in Jerusalem, St. Luke
records three journeys to Jerusalem,8 the last of which agrees, in regard to its starting
point, with the notices of the other Evangelists,9 always supposing that we have
correctly indicated the locality of 'the wilderness' whither, according to St. John xi. 54,
Christ retired previous to His last journey to Jerusalem. In this respect, although it is
impossible with our present information to localise 'the City of Ephraim,'10 the statement
that it was 'near the wilderness,' affords us sufficient general notice of its situation. For,
the New Testament speaks of only two 'wilderness,' that of Judę in the far South, and
a
that in the far North of Perę , or perhaps in the Decapolis , to which St. Luke refers as
a
the scene of the Baptist's labours, where Jesus was tempted, and whither He
afterwards withdrew. We can, therefore, have little doubt that St. John refers11 to this
district. And this entirely accords with the notices by the o ther Evangelists of Christ's last
journey to Jerusalem, as through the borders of Galilee and Samaria, and then across
the Jordan, and by Bethany to Jerusalem.
8. St. Luke ix. 51; xiii. 22; xviii. 31.
9. St. Matt. xix. 1; St. Mark x. 1.
10. Comp. the suggestions in Neubauer, Geog. de Talm. p. 155.
11. in St. John xi.
54.
It follows (as previously stated) that St. Luke's account of the three journeys to
Jerusalem fits into the narrative of Christ's three appearances in Jerusalem as