I N D E X
much humbler station. This Samaritaness may have chosen 'Jacob's Well,' perhaps,
because she had been at work in the fields close by; or else, because her abode was nearer
in that direction - for the ancient Sychar may have extended southward; perhaps, because,
if her character was what seems implied in verse 18, the concourse of the more common
women at the village -well of an evening might scarcely be a pleasant place of resort to
one with her history. In any case, we may here mark those Provident ial leadings in our
everyday life, to which we are so often almost as much spiritually indebted, as to grace
itself; which, indeed, form part of the dispensation of grace. Perhaps we should note how,
all unconsciously to her (as so often to us), poverty and sin sometimes bring to the well
by which Jesus sits weary, when on His return from self-righteous Judæa.
But these are only symbols; the barest facts of the narrative are themselves sufficiently
full of spiritual interest. Both to Jesus and to the woman, the meeting was unsought,
Providential in the truest sense - God-brought. Reverently, so far as the Christ is
concerned, we add, that both acted truly - according to what was in them. The request:
'Give Me to drink,' was natural on the part of the thirst y traveller, when the woman had
come to draw water, and they who usually ministered to Him were away.  17 Even if He
had not spoken, the Samaritaness would have recognised the Jew by His appearance18
and dress, if, as seems likely, He wore the fringes on the border of His garment.19 His
speech would, by its pronunciation, place His nationality beyond doubt.20 Any kindly
address, conveying a request not absolutely necessary, would naturally surprise the
woman; for, as the Evangelist explanatively adds: 'Jews have no dealings with
Samaritans,'21 or rather, as the expression implies, no needless, friendly, nor familiar
intercourse with them - a statement true at all times. Besides, we must remember that this
was an ignorant Samaritaness of the lower order. In the mind of such an one, two points
would mainly stand out: that the Jews in their wicked pride would have no intercourse
with them; and that Gerizim, not Jerusalem, as the Jews falsely asserted, was the place of
rightful worship. It was, therefore, genuine s urprise which expressed itself in the
question: 'How is it, Thou, being a Jew, of me askest to drink?' It was the first lesson she
learned, even before He taught her. Here was a Jew, not like ordinary Jews, not like what
she had hitherto thought them: what was the cause of this difference?
17. ver. 8.
18. According to the testimony of travellers the Samaritans, with the exception of the
High-Priestly family, have not the common, well-known type of Jewish face and feature.
19. The 'fringes' on the Tallith of the Samaritans are blue, while those worn by the Jews,
whether on the Arba Kanphoth or the Tallith , are white. The Samaritans do not seem to
have worn phylacteries (Menach. 42 b). But neither did many of the Jews of old - nor, I
feel persuaded, our Lord (comp. Jost, Gesch. d. Judenth. vol. i. p. 60).
20. There were, undoubtedly, marked differences of pronunciation between the Jews and
the Samaritans. Without entering into details, it may be said, that they chiefly concern the
vowel-sounds; and among consonants the gutturals (which are generally not
pronounced), the aspirates, and the letter # which is not, as in Hebrew, either #&
(pronounced s), or #∃ (pronounced sh), but is always pronounced as 'sh.' In connection
with this we may notice one of those instances, how a strange mistake comes 'by
tradition' to be commonly received. It has been asserted that, if Jesus had said to the