the bir th from above; to enter it, the double baptismal birth of what John's Baptism had
meant, and of what Christ's Baptism was.
Accordingly, all this sounded quite strange and unintelligible to Nicodemus. He could
understand how a man might become other, and so ultimately be other; but how a man
could first be other in order to become other - more than that, needed to be 'born from
above,' in order to 'see the Kingdom of God' - passed alike his experience and his Jewish
learning. Only one possibility of being occurred to him: that given him in his natural
disposition, or as a Jew would have put it, in his original innocency when he first entered
the world. And this - so to express ourselves - he thought aloud.20 But there was another
world of being than that of which Nicodemus thought. That world was the 'Kingdom of
God' in its essential contrariety to the Kingdom of this world, whether in the general
sense of that expression, or even in the special Judaistic sense attaching to the 'Kingdom'
of the Messiah. There was only one gate by which a man could pass into that Kingdom of
God - for that which was of the flesh could ever be only fleshly. Here a man might strive,
as did the Jews, by outward conformity to become, but he would never attain to being.
But that 'Kingdom' was spiritual, and here a man must be in order to become. How was
he to attain that new being? The Baptist had pointed it out in its negative aspect of
repentance and putting away the old by his Baptism of water; and as regarded its positive
aspect he had pointed to Him Who was to baptize with the Holy Ghost and with fire. This
was the gate of being through which a man must enter into the Kingdom, which was of
the Messiah, because it was of God and the Messiah was of God, and in that sense 'the
Teache r come from God' - that is, being sent of God, He taught of God by bringing to
God. This but a few who had gone to the Baptist had perceived, or indeed could perceive,
because the Baptist could in his Baptism only convey the negative, not the positive,
aspect of it. And it needed that positive aspect - the being born from above - in order to
see the Kingdom of God. But as to the mystery of this being in order to become - hark!
did he hear the sound of that wind as it swept past the Aliyah? He heard its voice; but he
neither knew whence it came, nor whither it went. So was every one that was born of the
Spirit. You heard the voice of the Spirit Who originated the new being, but the
origination of that new being, or its further development into all that it might and would
become, lay beyond man's observation.
20. ver. 4.
Nicodemus now understood in some measure what entrance into the Kingdom meant; but
its how seemed only involved in greater mystery. That it was such a mystery, unthought
and unimagined in Jewish theology, was a terribly sad manifestation of what the teaching
in Israel was. Yet it had all been told them, as of personal knowledge, by the Baptist and
by Jesus; nay, if they could only have received it, by the whole Old Testament. He
wanted to know the how of these things before he believed them. He believed them not,
though they passed on earth, because he knew not their how. How then could he believe
that how, of which the agency was unseen and in heaven? To that spring of being no one
could ascend but He that had come down from heaven, 21 and Who, to bring to us that
spring of being, had appeared as 'the Son of Man,' the Ideal Man, the embodiment of the
Kingdom of Heaven, and thus the only true Teacher come from God. Or did Nicodemus
think of another Teacher - hitherto their only Teacher, Moses - whom Jewish tradition