I N D E X
penances, nor self- chastisement. But the person who had entered the 'order' was as
effectually separated from all outside as if he had lived in another wor ld. Avoiding the
large cities as the centres of immorality,  122 they chose for their settlements chiefly
villages, one of their largest colonies being by the shore of the Dead Sea.123 At the same
time they had also 'houses' inmost, if not all the cities of Palestine,124 notably in
Jerusalem,125 where, indeed, one of the gates was named after them.126 In these 'houses'
they lived in common,127 under officials of their own. The affairs of 'the order' were
administered by a tribunal of at least a hundred members,128 wore a common dress,
engaged in common labor, united in common prayers, partook of common meals, and
devoted themselves to works of charity, for which each had liberty to draw from the
common treasury at his own discretion, except in the case of rela tives.129 It scarcely needs
mention that they extended fullest hospitality to strangers belonging to the order; in fact,
a special official was appointed for this purpose in every city.  130 Everything was of the
simplest character, and intended to purify the soul by the greatest possible avoidance, not
only of what was sinful, but of what was material. Rising at dawn, no profane word was
spoken till they had offered their prayers. These were addressed towards, if not to, the
rising sun - probably, as they wo uld have explained it, as the emblem of the Divine Light,
but implying invocation, if not adoration, of the sun.  131 After that they were dismissed by
their officers to common work. The morning meal was preceded by a lustration, or bath.
Then they put on their 'festive' linen garments, and entered, purified, the common hall as
their Sanctuary. For each meal was sacrificial, in fact, the only sacrifices which they
acknowledged. The 'baker,' who was really their priest - and naturally so, since he
prepared the sacrifice - set before each bread, and the cook a mess of vegetables. The
meal began with prayer by the presiding priest, for those who presided at these 'sacrifices'
were also 'priests,' although in neither case probably of Aaronic descent, but consecrated
by themselves.132 The sacrificial meal was again concluded by prayer, when they put off
their sacred dress, and returned to their labour. The evening meal was of exactly the same
description, and partaken of with the same rites as that of the morning.
121. Compare Josephus, Ant. xiii. 5, 9; xv. 10. 4, 5; xviii. 1. 5; Jewish War, ii. 8, 2 -13;
Philo, Quod omnis probus liber, 12, 13 (ed. Mangey, ii. 457-459; ed. Par. and Frcf. pp.
876-879; ed. Richter, vol. v. pp. 285-288); Pliny, N.H. v. 16, 17. For references in the
Fathers see Bp. Lightfoot on Colossians, pp. 83, 84 (note). Comp. the literature there and
in Schürer (Neutest. Zeitgesch. p. 599), to which I would add Dr. Ginburg's Art. 'Essenes'
in Smith's and Wace's Dict. of Chr. Biogr., vol. ii.
122. Philo, ii.p. 457.
123. Pliny, Hist. Nat. v. 16, 17.
124. Philo, u.s. p. 632; Jos. Jewish War ii. 8. 4.
125. Ant. xiii. 11.2; xv. 10. 5; xvii.
13.3.
126. War v. 4. 2.
127. Philo, u. s. p. 632.
128. War ii. 8. 9.
129. War ii. 8. 6.
130. u. s. § 4.
131. The distinction is Schürer's, although he is disposed to minimise this point. More on
this in the sequel.
132. Jos. War ii. 8. 5; Ant. xviii. 1. 5.