The most strongly and directly expressed censure is found in sect. 47. It is entirely in the second person
plural; but here the Romans shelter themselves behind the authority of Paul, who "charged you in the
Spirit...because even then ye had made parties." On this authority the direct address continues to the end of
the chapter: "it is shameful, dearly beloved, yes, utterly shameful and unworthy of your conduct in Christ,
that it should be reported that the very steadfast and ancient Church of the Corinthians, for the sake of one
or two persons, maketh sedition against its presbyters, etc." But the next sentence resumes the modest form:
"let us therefore root t his out quickly."
An example equally good is found in the letters of Ignatius; and this example is even more instructive than
that of Clement, because Ignatius' letters were addressed to several of the Seven Churches not many years
after the Revelation was written. Here we have letters written by the Bishop of Antioch, the mother Church
of all the Asian Churches, and by him when raised through the near approach of death to a plane higher
than mere humanity. He was already marked out for death--in the estimation of Christians the most
honourable kind of death--as the representative of his Church; and he was on his way to the place of
execution. He was eager to gain the crown of life. He had done with all thought of earth. If there was any one
who could speak authoritatively to the Asian Churches, it was their Syrian mother through this chosen
representative. But there is not, in any of his letters, anything approaching, even in the remotest degree, to
the authoritative tone of John's letters to the Seven Churches, or of Paul's letters, or of Peter's letter to the
Churches of Anatolia.
The Ephesians especially are addressed by Ignatius with profound respect. He ought to "be trained by them
for the contest in faith." He hopes to "be found in the company of the Christians of Ephesus." He is
"devoted to them and their representatives." He apologises for seeming to offer advice to them, who should
be his teachers; but they may be schoolfellows together--a touch which recalls the tone of Clement's letter;
he does not give orders to them, as though he were of some consequence. The tone throughout is that of
one who feels deeply that he is honoured in associating with the Ephesian Church through its envoys.
There is not the same tone of extreme respect in Ignatius' letters to Magnesia, Tralleis, Philadelphia, and
Smyrna, as in his letter to Ephesus. It is apparent that the Syrian bishop regarded Ephesus as occupying a
position of loftier dignity than the other Churches of the Province; and this is an important fact in itself. It
proves that already there was the beginning of a feeling, in some minds at least, that the Church of the
leading city of a Province was of higher dignity than those of the other cities, a feeling which ultimately
grew into the recognition of metropolitan bishoprics and exarchates, and a fully formed and graded
hierarchy.
But even to those Churches of less splendid history, his tone is not that of authority. It is true that he
sometimes uses the imperative; but in the more simple language of the Eastern peoples, as in modern Greek
and Turkish (at least in the conversational style), the imperative mood is often used, without any idea of
command, by an inferior to a superior, or by equal to equal; and in such cases it expresses no more than
extreme urgency. In Magn. sect. 3 the tone is one of urgent reasoning, and Lightfoot in his commentary
rightly paraphrases the imperative of the Greek by the phrase "I exhort you." In sect. 6 the imperative is
represented in Lightfoot's translation by "I advise you." In sect. 10 the advice is expressed in the first
person plural (a form which we found to be characteristic of Clement), "let us learn to live," "let us not be
insensible to His goodness." Then follows in sect. 11 an apology for even advising his correspondents,
"not because I have learned that any of you are so minded, but as one inferior to you, I would have you be
on your guard betimes." When in Trall. sect. 3 he is tempted to use the language of reproof, he refrains: "I
did not think myself competent for this, that being a convict I should give orders to you as though I were an
Apostle."
It is needless to multiply examples. The tone of the letters is the same throughout. Ignatius has not the right,
like Paul or Peter or an Apostle, to issue commands to the Asian Churches. He can only advise, and exhort,
and reason--in the most urgent terms, but as an equal to equals, as man to men, or, as he modestly puts it, as
inferior to superiors. He has just the same right and duty that every Christian has of interesting himself in