I N D E X
Chapter 3: The Christian Letters and Their Transmission
In the preceding chapter we have described the circumstances amid which the Christian letter-writing was
developed; and it was pointed out in conclusion that in the pressure of those circumstances, or rather in the
energetic use of the opportunities which the circumstances of the Roman Empire offered, there came into
existence a kind of letter, hitherto unknown in the world. The Christians developed the older class of letter
into new forms, applied it to new purposes, and placed it on a much higher plane than it had ever before
stood upon. In their hands communication by letter became one of the most important, if not the most
important, of the agencies for consolidating and maintaining the sense of unity among the scattered
members of the one universal Church. By means of letters the congregations expressed their mutual
affection and sympathy and sense of brotherhood, asked counsel of one another, gave advice with loving
freedom and plain speaking to one another, imparted mutual comfort and encouragement, and generally
expressed their sense of their common life. Thus arose a new category of epistles.
Dr. Deissmann in Bible Studies, p. 1ff, following older scholars, has rightly and clearly distinguished two
previously existing categories, the true letter-written by friend to friend or to friends, springing from the
momentary occasion, intended only for the eye of the person or persons to whom it is addressed--and the
literary epistle --written with an eye to the public, and studied with literary art. The literary epistle is
obviously later in origin than the true letter. It implies the previous existence of the true letter as a well-
recognised type of composition, and the deliberate choice of this type for imitation. Soon after the death of
Aristotle in 322 BC a fictitious collection of letters purporting to have been written by him was published.
Such forged letters are composed for a literary purpose with an eye to the opinion of the world. The forger
deliberately writes them after a certain type and with certain characteristics, which may cause them to be
taken for something which they are not really. A fabrication like this proves at least that the letter was
already an established form of composition; and the forger believed that he could calculate on rousing
public interest by falsely assuming this guise.
But it is impossible to follow Dr. Deissmann, it seems to me, when he goes on to reduce all the letters of the
New Testament to one or other of those categories. He shows, it is true, some consciousness that the two
older categories are insufficient, but the fact is that in the new conditions a new category had been
developed--the general letter addressed to a whole congregation or to the entire Church of Christ.
These are true letters, in the sense that they spring from the heart of the writer and speak direct to the heart
of the readers; that they were often written in answer to a question, or called forth by some special crisis in
the history of the persons addressed, so that they rise out of the actual situation in which the writer
conceives the readers to be placed; that they express the writer's keen and living sympathy with and
participation in the fortunes of the whole class addressed; that they are not affected by any thought of a
wider public than the persons whom he directly addresses; in short, he empties out his heart in them. On the
other hand, the letters of this class express general principles of life and conduct, religion and ethics,
applicable to a wider range of circumstances than those which have called forth the special letter; and they
appeal as emphatically and intimately to all Christians in all time as they did to those addressed in the first
instance.
It was not long before this wider appeal was perceived. It is evident that when St. Paul bade the Colossians
send his letter to be read in the Laodicean Church, and read themselves the Laodicean letter, he saw that
each was applicable to a wider circle than it directly addressed. But it is equally evident that the Colossian
letter was composed not with an eye to that wider circle, but directly to suit the critical situation in Colossae.
The wider application arises out of the essential similarity of human nature in both congregations and in all
mankind. The crisis that has occurred in one congregation is likely at some period to occur in other similar
bodies; and the letter which speaks direct to the heart of one man or one body of men will speak direct to the
heart of all men in virtue of their common human nature. Here lies the essential character of this new