An Alphabetical Analysis
Volume 4 - Dispensational Truth - Page 7 of 196
INDEX
receive the at-one-ment, the result of the atoning sacrifice of Christ, which
the reading of Romans 5:11 in the A.V. teaches.
Cremer's note on the two words katallasso and apokatallasso is
suggestive:
`Apo, referring to the state to be left, and kata to the state to be
sought after ... katallasso is the setting up of a relationship of
peace not existing before; apokatallasso is the restoration of a
relationship of peace which has been disturbed; cf.  apokathistemi,
apokatorthos'.
Exclusive to Paul
Of all the New Testament writers, it will be observed that the words
katallasso, katallage and apokatallasso are used only by Paul, for to him was
committed the message of grace that provided complete acceptance in Christ
for the sinner and the ungodly.  Moreover, to Paul was entrusted that
stewardship towards the Gentiles which:
(1)
Dealt with their alienation from God, in Adam, apart from
personal sins (Rom. 5:12).
(2)
Dealt with their alienation from God as Gentile nations (Rom.
1:18 and 11:15).
(3)
Dealt with their alienation from God by sins personally committed
(2 Cor. 5).
(4)
Dealt with the alienation perpetuated by the distinctions of
circumcision and uncircumcision, which was abolished in the new
man of the Mystery (Eph. 2).
(5)
Dealt with the alienation of the whole Church of the One Body
from its destined sphere in the heavenlies, far above principalities
and powers (Col. 1).
Let us pass in review these five aspects of Reconciliation:
(1)
Reconciliation as it deals with the Alienation of Man from God in
Adam (Rom. 5:12)
This aspect of human need and Divine provision is scarcely touched upon
in the Old Testament or in the Gospels.  Paul is the only one who has
anything to teach regarding Adam and his one great act of disobedience.  This
is the mystery of Romans 16:25 and this feature is discussed in the article
entitled Romans (p. 126).
When we commence reading at Romans 5:12 we leave behind the question of
`sins' for the deeper question of `sin'; we leave the disobedience to the law
of Sinai for the one transgression of the garden of Eden.  Moses and Abraham
fade from view, and Adam is revealed as the channel of sin and death, and of
its dominion.  Here we are to learn the utter ruin of the creature as
something deeper than the failure of the Gentile under the law of conscience,
or of the Jew under the law of Moses.  Here we shall plumb the depths of the
depravity of our nature; here we shall come face to face with the dread fact
that in our flesh dwelleth no good thing.  This is a more terrible revelation
than that of Romans 3:12.  There, we read that there is none that doeth good;
here we are to learn that, apart from deeds altogether, there is none that is
good, or that has any hope or possibility, in himself, of pleasing God.